RSS

>Starving the travel bug

13 Nov

>As I mentioned in an earlier post, after I got back from the USA, I hadn’t been overseas since 2005. Before that, I travelled internationally about once a year, sometimes even twice. I often planned back-to-back conferences, and stayed on for a day or so to catch up with colleagues or carry out other research.

In 2002, I attended a conference in Vancouver and stopped over in the UK on the way home to visit my brother, who was living in Oxford. He’d been cheffing in England for many months. It was one of the best trips I’ve ever made. I’d brought a stash of sweet-cured salmon (from Granville Island) with me and we savoured every morsel. In between luxurious tastings, we hung the bag of salmon out my brother’s window. It was so cold, we almost had to wait for it to thaw when we brought it back in; I should point out that it didn’t last long at all.

2002: Sheldonian Theatre, Oxford (Photo by Tseen)

Since I had E. in late 2006, my travelling became severely curtailed. I didn’t go away overnight for at least a year and a bit, and the recent USA trip was the longest I’ve been away for more than 2 nights since she was born. It was the first time I’d ever been away from G. since he was born in mid-2009. 
Before having kids, I thought that parents became less travelled beings because of the demands of the children and the detrimental effect being away had on them. I’m lucky enough to have S. and my mother with whom to share childcare in our household, so I’ve never been a sole parent in charge of the kids for longer than maybe a day. While the load would fall to S. if I were away, it’s not an unworkable situation; similarly, I’ve realised the kids aren’t that affected by my being away for stints of a week or so (the USA trip was 1.5 weeks). 
The biggest obstacle to my going away on conference or research trips is…me. I find it preferable to be a part of the kids’ routines than not. I’d been away quite a bit, pre-kids, so it’s not as if I’m normally leary of travelling away from home. It’s just that ‘home’ has acquired more emotional weight since the children arrived. There’s a complicated and demanding web of being there for them and, for the most part, I like it. I know this means I don’t advance my career as quickly as I could, and I’m not collaborating/networking as much as I could. Occasionally, I’ll worry about it. Then I ask myself whether I’d change the way I’m approaching things and, really, the answer is no. 
I met a female academic recently who was encouraging me to get away from the home-front more often, as it would allow me to re-fresh my acquaintance with professional-me and my high level of functioning as a serious academic, etc. At the time, I was nodding along and thinking, “Yeah, I should. The kids and S. don’t mind, as long as it’s not TOO long…” When I got home, I swore I’d never, ever go away for so long again (yes, for all of 1.5 weeks). 
It’s a polarised thing and I can’t shake it. When I’m away and doing what I do, it’s fantastic, fun and inspiring; just before I leave home and when I am freshly home, I can’t imagine going away and find myself wanting to remain in the domestic nest.
I have a male colleague who’s in the same kind of job as me. This year, I think he’s been on trips so often that I doubt if he was in Australia more than half a year. Many of the trips were international, and they were usually at least a week, sometimes three weeks. He has a young family, like me. His wife works part-time. He seems to work all the time. There’s no doubt that he’s a super performer, and he’ll go far in a very short span of time. He’s quite a political animal, and very ambitious. We’ve worked together on a couple of things now. Being in close contact with how he organises his time, and seeing what he prioritises, is interesting. His intense work habits contrast very strongly with mine. It’s probably not a good thing to extrapolate from the habits of an obvious workaholic (but here I go)…is this a male/female thing? To some extent, I feel that I shouldn’t go away too often or too long because putting the whole load on S. is unfair. Does my colleague not feel that? Or does he think what he does is more important? It probably doesn’t help that I’ve been ambivalent about my career ever since I finished my PhD (excellent timing). 
Now that I may not be in an academic job anymore, this kind of anxiety about travelling is probably moot. There’s no doubt that my career has been compromised by having children. The time out of work during maternity leave (plus the time prepping to be on leave + catching up on return), making a real effort to keep regular hours (no all-nighters, no staying-late-at-the-office habits, no work on weekends if at all possible), not going away to as many conferences or taking research trips that are as extended (there’s a world of difference between doing basic requirement fieldwork or taking longer and having more thoughtful time)…all these things mean missed opportunities and a lower profile. There’s no getting around that. Granted, this is the way I’ve chosen to have kids and balance the work/domestic juggle. Other women in my school don’t seem to have had bumps in their career path at all from having a family, but it’s not about the comparisons, is it?     
About these ads
 
3 Comments

Posted by on 13/11/2010 in academia, domestic, gender

 

3 responses to “>Starving the travel bug

  1. Lisa

    14/11/2010 at 2:25 am

    >I think you are comparing at the wrong end of the cycle. It takes a long time to grow a child. Don't look at the high fliers around you with young children, look at your senior colleagues with stellar careers and children in their late teens or early twenties whom they don't understand, don't get on with, or fret over. You'll probably find that others of your colleagues have had steady, rather than stellar, careers, are fantastic teachers, and may not make aspro before they retire but they still have a good relationship with their kids and families. We're all building for the long term, it just depends what we think is the most important outcome at the end of that term.

     
  2. tseen

    15/11/2010 at 9:34 am

    >It's times like this, when career limbo hits, that I realise how embedded I am in the university and how closely I identify as a 'research fellow'. Most of the time, when a salary and job are forthcoming, I doubt my affiliation with the institution and don't see myself as wedded to this career.Amazing how clarifying being unemployed can be. ;)You're right about the outcome, and I don't really think in terms of getting to X level within 3 yrs, 5 yrs, etc…except when I'm in a bog of uncertainty, like now!

     
  3. Lisa

    17/11/2010 at 10:06 pm

    >I think I understand, and I'm not for a moment suggesting that kids are everything and career is unimportant. Kids grow up and it helps no one to hang your entire existence on them. A colleague that I speak with from time to time and I both have weeks on end when we want to throw it all in and go landscape gardening. It's a dream when things are going badly and we're sick of the place, but this whole learning and enquiry thing gets into your blood and I know that really landscape gardening wouldn't cut it for me. I hope you get some career clarity soon. Very disappointing when you really want something and miss out but if anyone can make it you can.

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,576 other followers

%d bloggers like this: